Is Time Bending the 3rd Dimension in Spacetime Curvature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter overcaffein8d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bending Spacetime
overcaffein8d
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Spacetime_curvature.png"

The picture linked above shows the spacetime curvature. Apparently, it's a 3d model.

But it's not! What i think (and basically trying to find out about) is that space itself is imagined as the 2d grid. What the Earth does is bends it into the 3rd dimension.

So, with an actual 3d grid, wouldn't this actually be bending not space [3rd dimension] but time [4th]? instead of bending the 2nd dimension into the 3rd, i think it would bend the 3rd into the 4th.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What i think (and basically trying to find out about) is that space itself is imagined as the 2d grid. What the Earth does is bends it into the 3rd dimension.
That's what the picture does. The concept is that Earth bends these two dimensions in itself, not into a third dimension. The third dimension is merely to help your imagination.
In real life, there are 4 dimensons which are bent not into a fifth dimension, but into themselves.
 
overcaffein8d said:
But it's not! What i think (and basically trying to find out about) is that space itself is imagined as the 2d grid. What the Earth does is bends it into the 3rd dimension.
Exactly, it shows only the curvature of space not spacetime. The difference is explained here:
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb..._and_general_relativity/curved_spacetime.html

overcaffein8d said:
So, with an actual 3d grid, wouldn't this actually be bending not space [3rd dimension] but time [4th]?
Depends how you define the grid dimensions. You can also have a 2d grid, representing 1 space dimension and the time dimension, to show the curvature of spacetime. This is done in the links I provided in https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1557122&postcount=4".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the quick response.

dude. that is cool.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top