Is Time Dilation Creating an Infinite Loop Between A and B's Observations?

phylove
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question.

There are 2 men, A and B.

A is on the earth’s surface and B is in a spaceship traveling at a speed comparable to the speed of light. Both A and B have a light clock each, that is, a pair of parallel mirrors a fixed distance apart and a pulse of light being reflected between the 2 mirrors.

At A’s end: 10 oscillations have occurred in the light clock on earth. He also sees that only 8 oscillations have occurred in the space ship.

At B’s end: 8 oscillations have occurred in the light clock in the space ship. Shouldn’t the number of oscillations he observes on the light clock on Earth be lesser than 8?

In that case wouldn’t this form something like an infinite loop.? Wherein the number of oscillations each perceives for the other decreases for a set time? I’m not sure where I’m going wrong. It may be that I not have understood the fundamentals of time dilation, so could you please explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thats where relativity of simultaneity comes in
 
Hi phylove, welcome to PF
phylove said:
I’m not sure where I’m going wrong. It may be that I not have understood the fundamentals of time dilation, so could you please explain this?
Here is a diagram I made a while ago showing two different observers moving at 0.6 c relative to each other. If you look carefully at this diagram you can see how all three effects (length contraction, time dilation, and the relativity of simultaneity) work together symmetrically. In this diagram time is vertical and space is horizontal in the black frame, and the lines of constant time and constant position are drawn for both the black frame and the white frame.

attachment.php?attachmentid=12753&d=1203725484.png


Time dilation: Follow the white x'=0 line up from the origin, note that it crosses the black t=2 line before it reaches the white t'=2 line, meaning that the white clock runs slow in the black frame. Similarly, follow the black x=0 line up from the origin, note that it crosses the white t'=2 line before it reaches the black t=2 line, meaning that the black clock runs slow in the white frame.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top