Is Time Dilation Explained by the Lorenz Factor in Relativity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding time dilation in the context of the Lorenz factor in relativity, specifically through the example of a muon created in the atmosphere and its decay at sea level. A user expresses difficulty grasping the concept and seeks clarification on the relationship between time intervals in different frames. Responses indicate that the forum is not primarily for teaching physics concepts but rather for problem-solving once foundational knowledge is established. Participants suggest that the user may need to engage more deeply with their coursework or textbooks before seeking help. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of learning relativity and the importance of foundational understanding before tackling complex problems.
trevorr93
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In which of the following situations is the time interval between the two events in one frame equal to (LORENZ FACTOR (special y symbol)) multiplied by the time interval in the other frame. explain briefly.

a) A muon is created (event #1) high in Earth's atmosphere and decays (event #2) at sea-level. The frames are the muon and the earth.

Can someone please explain this question and this topic in general? I am finding the readings very hard to understand.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I don't think this forum is meant for explaining physics, which may be why you haven't gotten any replies yet.

Usually, someone learns the physics, then when they are set a problem, they do the problem, and show their working on this forum if they think they have gone wrong.

Have you learned enough to give the question an attempt? By the sounds of the post, I'd guess you're not there yet. Are you learning relativity in college or something? Do you have a textbook?
 
it's his stinkin isu for grade 12 physics. we are given a booklet with a few examples but its really complicated stuff.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top