Is V a Vector Space with Transpose-Modified Scalar Multiplication?

NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let V= set of 2x2 matrices with the normal addition, but where multiplication is defined as: β#A=β(A^T) where A^T is the transpose of A.


Homework Equations


The axiom about 1#A=A


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that because you can show that not ALL matrices satisfy A=A^T, you can't have a vector space since the multiplication by 1 doesn't hold up.

But then I'm wondering whether I'm assuming that the multiplicative identity should be the "normal" 1 (ie that 1 is just the scalar 1 in a normal R^n vector space).

How do you prove a multiplicative identity absolutely does NOT exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So are you trying to prove that V is a vector space if it obeys the normal matrix addition, but has a unique multiplication scalar multiplication defined as # which is sort of a mapping from A to At?

Your notation is a bit confusing to me.
 
NullSpace0 said:

Homework Statement


Let V= set of 2x2 matrices with the normal addition, but where multiplication is defined as: β#A=β(A^T) where A^T is the transpose of A.


Homework Equations


The axiom about 1#A=A


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that because you can show that not ALL matrices satisfy A=A^T, you can't have a vector space since the multiplication by 1 doesn't hold up.

But then I'm wondering whether I'm assuming that the multiplicative identity should be the "normal" 1 (ie that 1 is just the scalar 1 in a normal R^n vector space).

How do you prove a multiplicative identity absolutely does NOT exist?

If there were a scalar β that was a multiplicative identity it would have to satisfy β(A^T)=A for all matrices A. Show there isn't.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top