Is Work Dependent on Launch Angle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between launch angle and work done on a projectile. A 0.50-kg projectile is launched at 20 m/s and 37 degrees, landing at the same height, resulting in -100 J of work done. Participants clarify that while kinetic energy is not conserved, the total mechanical energy (kinetic plus potential) remains constant when the launch and landing heights are the same. Therefore, the angle of launch does not affect the work calculation since the energy lost is solely based on the initial kinetic energy. The conclusion is that the angle is irrelevant for work done when heights are equal.
DmytriE
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Textbook problem:

A 0.50-kg projectile is given an initial speed of 20m/s at an angle of 37 degrees to a horizontal surface and lands a certain distance (range) from its launch point. How much work is done on the projectile on landing? (Neglect air resistance).

So the solution is -1.0 x 102 J

I found the kinetic energy using K=1/2mv2 substituting the known values in for the variables. Low and behold I got 100 J. Knowing that energy is conserved why is it that I did not have to take the angle at which the projectile was shot to find amount of work at landing?

My only explanation for it is that since energy is conserved the path by which it gets there is independent of the path taken. Is my thinking right or on the right track or am I in left field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DmytriE said:
T
My only explanation for it is that since energy is conserved the path by which it gets there is independent of the path taken. Is my thinking right or on the right track or am I in left field?
The energy it gives up is its kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is not conserved. Kinetic + potential energy is conserved. But, so long as the potential energy at launch is the same as the potential energy on landing, the kinetic energy it gives up on landing will be the same as the kinetic energy at launch. This only works if the height of launch is the same as the height of landing.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
This only works if the height of launch is the same as the height of landing.

AM

So since the landing place was at the same height as the launch the need to use the angle for calculations was unnecessary, correct?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top