Is \(x^k p_x^m\) Hermitian?

KBriggs
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the operator x^kp_x^m is not hermitian, whereas \frac{x^kp_x^m+p_x^mx^k}{2} is, where k and m are positive integers.




The Attempt at a Solution



Is this valid?

<x^kp_x^m>^*=\left(\int_{-\infty}^\infty\Psi^*x^k(-i\hbar)^m\frac{\partial^m\Psi}{\partial x^m} dx\right)^*
=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\Psi^*(i\hbar)^m\frac{\partial^m(x^k\Psi^*)}{\partial x^m} dx \neq <x^kp_x^m>

That is, can you conjugate an integral by conjugating its integrand? Can you conjugate a derivitive by conjugating the function you are differentiating?

And assuming that you can, did I carry out the conjugation correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can conjugate the integrand, however, you have to conjugate all of the terms. Basically what happens is that the bra and the ket switch, and the operator is conjugated.

\langle \phi | A | \psi \rangle^* = \langle \psi | A^* | \phi \rangle
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top