Israel: 86% Increase in Effectiveness with 3rd Pfizer Dose

  • Context: COVID 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Israel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reported 86% increase in effectiveness of the third Pfizer vaccine dose for individuals over 60 in Israel, as stated by a healthcare provider. Initial calculations suggest that achieving herd immunity may require vaccination rates exceeding 86%. However, there is a critical distinction between protection against symptomatic disease and protection against infection, which remains unclear in the reported data. Experts caution that relying on vaccination alone for long-term herd immunity may not be viable due to the potential for reinfections and waning immunity over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vaccine efficacy metrics and calculations
  • Familiarity with herd immunity concepts and thresholds
  • Knowledge of COVID-19 transmission dynamics and vaccination strategies
  • Awareness of the differences between symptomatic disease and infection protection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodology behind measuring vaccine effectiveness against infection
  • Explore the implications of waning immunity in COVID-19 vaccines
  • Investigate the role of booster doses in enhancing protection
  • Examine studies on herd immunity thresholds for various infectious diseases
USEFUL FOR

Public health officials, epidemiologists, vaccine researchers, and anyone involved in COVID-19 response strategies will benefit from this discussion.

Messages
10,971
Reaction score
3,839
Data has come in from Isreal about the effectiveness of a third dose:
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/...e-in-over-60s-says-israel-healthcare-provider

Remember this is 86% better than those that have already had two doses.

I will leave it to others to do the calculations but my initial calculation in the next post says we may be able to get heard immunity. Saying something like that is so important I would like others views.

Note: Edited to reflect more detailed calculation.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Ok, here is my detailed calculations. Vaccine effectiveness is 37/149144 = 99.975%. So the vaccination number is (1-1/6.9)/.99975 = 86%. It looks like my initial calculations may have been overly pessimistic. We could get herd immunity at greater than 86% vaccination. If true, it could have a big impact.

Thanks
Bill
 
A key piece of information missing from the news article is how they measured protection. Is the figure they cite protection against symptomatic disease or protection against infection? Studies of the vaccine shows that protection against symptomatic disease is higher than protection against infection. However, these numbers would exclude people infected asymptomatically who are still capable of spreading the virus.

Some of your conclusions (esp. with regard to herd immunity) assume that the figures represent protection against infection, which is not clear in the article (measuring protection against infection is much harder to do as it requires regular testing, so it is unlikely that this study measured protection against infection).

This is why it is quite annoying when data gets released via the news media rather than from scientific publications or pre-prints detailing the methods used to collect and analyze the data.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Omega0, StoneTemplePython, jim mcnamara and 2 others
From the other human coronaviruses, protection against infection will fall again with time. So I don't think this supports a stable herd immunity plan.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1083-1
"Caution should be taken when relying on policies that require long-term immunity, such as vaccination or natural infection to reach herd immunity. ... We show that reinfections by natural infection occur for all four seasonal coronaviruses, suggesting that it is a common feature for all human coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Reinfections occurred most frequently at 12 months after infection, indicating that protective immunity is only short-lived."

It will slow down transmission, and buy time for people to get vaccinated. But I think it ultimately requires people to get vaccinated to protect themselves against severe disease, rather than relying on others to get vaccinated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and sysprog
Eran Segal: "Israel is reporting a 4-fold increase in protection from infection after a 3rd booster shot, compared to an age-gender matched cohort of 2 doses And 5-6 fold increased protection from hospitalization and severe disease 3rd dose now approved for all, tomorrow starting in 40+ y/o"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 235 ·
8
Replies
235
Views
21K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
34K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K