Issue converting dV to dx dy dz

  • Thread starter Thread starter Addez123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx
Addez123
Messages
199
Reaction score
21
Homework Statement
Integrate the vector field
$$A = (2xy + x^2, 2 +yz, 2z^4)$$
over the sphere surface:
$$x^2+(y-1)^2+z^2 = 4$$
where y >= 0
Relevant Equations
Divergence theorem
I can calculate the divergence
$$div A = 2y + 2x + z + 8z^3$$
Now I have to integrate over this cut-off sphere.

So I decide I'll cut it up into small discs with height dy and integrate over that
$$dV = \pi(4 - (y-1)^2)^2 * dy$$

My issue here is I don't know how to integrate 2x + z + 8z^3.
Not only that but it's suppose to be a triple integral and all I get is dy..

I must have missed a step but idk which :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's not sufficient symmetry to use discs as volume elements, because the vector field ##\mathbf{A}## varies within each disc. Exploit the symmetry. Shift ##y' \equiv y-1## and write the resulting integral in terms of spherical coordinates (with ##dV = r^2 \sin{\theta} dr d\theta d\phi##).
 
Addez123 said:
Homework Statement:: Integrate the vector field
$$A = (2xy + x^2, 2 +yz, 2z^4)$$
over the sphere surface:
$$x^2+(y-1)^2+z^2 = 4$$
where y >= 0
Relevant Equations:: Divergence theorem

So I decide I'll cut it up into small discs with height dy and integrate over that
dV=π(4−(y−1)2)2∗dy
This is not dV. It is dV integrated over the x and z coordinates assuming that the integrand does not depend on them. (Assuming you get rid of that additional square you inserted.)

However, there may be a way to get rid of that pesky x and z dependence if you think a few extra times before writing down the integral.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top