Issue regarding oxygen storage with other elements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a paragraph from Nick Lane's book, "Oxygen," which addresses the release of oxygen from cyanobacteria after ice ages. There is confusion regarding the concept of burying oxygen versus its reaction with organic matter. The argument suggests that reacting oxygen with organic matter is preferable because it could form covalent bonds, as organic matter can donate electrons. However, the text emphasizes the importance of preventing the complete re-uptake of atmospheric oxygen. A point of contention arises over the oxidation processes of iron and carbon, with a correction made regarding the oxidation states of iron, clarifying that rusting involves a two or three-electron oxidation rather than a single-electron loss. The discussion critiques Lane's understanding of these chemical processes, highlighting a perceived error in his explanation of oxidation states and their implications for oxygen binding.
olee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
this is from Nick Lane's Oxygen book
I didn't quite understand this paragraph regarding the sudden release of a large amount of oxygen from cyanobacteria following the ice ages

2q20gzp.png


i don't understand how it's better to bury it. surely reacting with organic matter would be better as it is more likely to form a covalent bond with oxygen as it is willing to donate electrons
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Consider his actual words..." ...best way of preventing the complete re-uptake of atmospheric oxygen..."

You are saying the same thing.
 
When oxidized, a single atom of iron loses one electron to oxygen to form rust.

Well, that's wrong. Fe(I) is a rare and unstable redox state for iron. Rusting consists of two, or three-electron oxidation to form FeO or Fe2O3.

A carbon atom does undergo four-electron oxidation to form CO2, but that means it binds 33% more oxygen than iron, not four times as much.
(if we're going to be fair and choose the highest oxidation state of iron, since he chose the highest oxidation state of carbon).

That's a pretty embarrassing mistake coming from a guy who's got a PhD.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top