Issue with book's solution for a block projected up an....

  • Thread starter Thread starter CVRIV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem in a physics book regarding the velocity of a block projected upwards. The user initially struggled with the book's solution, which provided a velocity of 2.5 m/s, while their calculations led to non-real results due to a negative value under the square root. Upon further examination, the user realized they had mistakenly used a mass of 5 kg instead of the correct 0.5 kg and failed to square the x variable. Interestingly, despite these errors, they still arrived at the correct answer for part A. The user expressed gratitude for the assistance received in clarifying their confusion.
CVRIV
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
Hello everyone:) I'm having an issue with an example problem in the book I'm using.

I attached a pic of the problem and the book's solution.

The issue I'm having is that I have no idea how the book got the velocity it did via the solution it presented. When I worked out the problem myself, before looking at the book's solution, I arrived at the very same solution, but I was receiving non-real results, because the magnitude within the square root is negative. That's when I peaked at the book only to find that the book did what I did, except the book has 2.5m/s. I have no idea how it came to that.

I didn't want to just write that down without having some kind of explanation. Can you help me out? Is the book wrong? Am I wrong? What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • 0316190142~2.jpg
    0316190142~2.jpg
    90.7 KB · Views: 326
  • 0316190142c~2.jpg
    0316190142c~2.jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 307
Physics news on Phys.org
CVRIV said:
same solution, but I was receiving non-real results, because the magnitude within the square root is negative
I do not see how you got that from the expression in the solution. Did you forget that (-x)2 is +x2?
Please post your working.
 
I figured out what I did wrong. I was using a mass of 5kg instead of 0.5kg.

The crazy thing is that I acquired the correct value for part A using the wrong amount of mass! What happened was I didn't square the x variable so with those two mistakes, I got the right answer. Ha ha.

Thanks for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top