A I've tried to read the reason for using Fourier transform

LSMOG
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I've tried to read the reason for using Fourier transform in wave packets, I don't understand why. Please help me with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LSMOG said:
I've tried to read the reason for using Fourier transform in wave packets, I don't understand why. Please help me with this.

Is this specifically a physics question, or a question about Fourier transforms?

The issue is this: Suppose we have a particle that is initially distributed in a packet described by (in one-dimension)

\psi_0(x) = F(x)

where F(x) is some function that is strongly peaked at x=x_0. For example, it might be Gaussian:

F(x) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi \lambda}} e^{- \lambda (x-x_0)^2}

Now, you would like to know what \psi(x,t) will look like at some time t > 0. You can try to solve the Schrodinger equation for that particular initial condition, but here's an easier way:

You know that a solution to Schrodinger's equation is \psi(x,t) = e^{i (kx - \omega_k t)}, corresponding to the initial wave function \psi_0(x) = e^{i k x}, where for the nonrelativistic Schrodinger equation, \omega_k = \frac{\hbar k^2}{2m} for a particle of mass m. So we can use that knowledge to solve the general problem:

Write \psi_0(x) = \int dk \tilde{F}(k) e^{i kx}, where \tilde{F}(k) is the Fourier transform of F(x). Then, at a later time t, the wave function will be \psi(x,t) = \int dk \tilde{F}(k) e^{i (kx - \omega_k t)}. Voila! The Fourier transform allows you to write down the general solution.
 
Thanks, why don'y we consider the solution to the Schrodinger equation as a general solution
 
LSMOG said:
Thanks, why don'y we consider the solution to the Schrodinger equation as a general solution

The issue is how to come up with a solution to the Schrodinger equation. The Fourier transform gives you a way to do that.
 
stevendaryl said:
The issue is how to come up with a solution to the Schrodinger equation. The Fourier transform gives you a way to do that.

If you are trying to solve the equation

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \psi(x,t) = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \psi(x,t)

subject to the initial condition

\psi(x,0) = F(x)

then the unique solution is

\psi(x,t) = \int dk e^{i (kx - \omega_k t)} \tilde{F}(k)

where \tilde{F}(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int dx F(x) e^{-ikx}, and where \omega_k = \frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}.

This solution can also be written in the form:

\psi(x,t) = e^{-i \frac{H t}{\hbar}} F(x)

where H = \frac{- \hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top