Jacobi least time vs. Fermat Hamilton

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the comparison between the Jacobi least time principle and the Fermat/Hamilton principle, with a focus on their generality. The Jacobi principle is often considered less general because it applies specifically to time, while the Fermat/Hamilton principle encompasses a broader range of physical scenarios, including action. The confusion arises from the potential mislabeling of Jacobi's principle as Fermat's least time, indicating a possible overlap in concepts. Participants seek clarification on the implications of using one principle over the other and whether one is inherently superior. Ultimately, understanding these principles is crucial for grasping variational methods in physics.
andrewr
Messages
262
Reaction score
0
Could anyone give me a simple explanation as to why the Fermat/Hamilton principle would be called more general than the Jacobi least time principle? I am trying to understand what differences would result from using the one principle vs. the other; eg: where/in what way would the Jacobi least time be inferior?

I know basic ODE, PDE, linear algebra, and variational methods. I have a BSEE background.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I googled "Jacobi least time" and didn't get any results. I know what the Fermat/Hamiltonian principle is though. Could you describe the Jacobi least time principle? Maybe people might know it by a more common name.
 
RedX said:
Oh I see. Here's some lecture notes that explains it from baez's website:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/classical/cm05week05.pdf

Thank you, that helps. The literature I was reading was ambiguous, I think "Jacobi least time" is supposed to be "Fermat's least time" and the author switched the names, or meant Jacobi's analogy of Fermat's principle for particles.

I still don't understand why one principle (either) would be more general than the other. Is "least time" ever inferior to "least action"? or vice versa?

--Thanks.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top