Joining Seamless Pipes: Recommended Method to Sustain Pressure

  • Thread starter Thread starter polka129
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the recommended methods for joining seamless pipes to sustain high operating pressures, specifically in the context of a water jetwashing application. It explores various welding techniques, material considerations, and safety regulations relevant to high-pressure systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests welding or using flanges to join seamless pipes, emphasizing the importance of not exceeding the internal pressure rating of the pipe material.
  • Another participant provides specific details about the application, including the seamless pipe material (ASTM A 106 Grade B), pipe schedule (160), and operational conditions (280 bar pressure for 14 hours), raising concerns about alignment and the need for flush welds.
  • There is a query regarding the appropriate welding procedure for seamless pipes, including considerations for filler metal selection and testing plans to ensure joint integrity under high pressure.
  • A later reply raises safety concerns about the high operating pressure, questioning OSHA regulations and potential liability issues related to weld failure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of concern regarding safety and technical specifications, but there is no consensus on the best welding method or the specific safety regulations that should be considered.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed discussion on specific welding procedures for seamless pipes and the absence of a comprehensive safety framework for high-pressure applications.

Who May Find This Useful

Engineers and technicians involved in high-pressure piping systems, particularly those working with seamless pipes in industrial applications.

polka129
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
what is the recommended method to join two lengths of seamless pipes such that the joint should sustain a particular operating pressure?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Pipe ends can be welded to one another or you can add flanges to either end and bolt the flanges together.

In any event, the pipe material and pipe size will have a certain internal pressure rating, and it is not recommended that this pressure rating be exceeded, regardless of the method of connection.
 
thank you for your reply..

this is to be used in water for jetwashing at normal temperature and a operation duration of 14 hours subjected to a working pressure of 280 bar
Seamless pipe material: ASTM A 106 Grade B
Pipe schedule: 160
3/4” (the nominal pipe size)

Important consideration:1) this pipe travels horizontally between circular supports/guides.so the weld beads should be flush with the outer surface of the pipe so as to avoid interference/jamming with the circular guides.

2)alignment..the tolerances and alignment issues are of paramount importance because any mis-alignment would inhibit smooth travel through the circular supports

circumferential butt welding of seamless pipes must be somewhat different from butt welding of welded pipes .what weld procedure should be adopted? What are the considerations for butt weld specific for seamless pipes like proper selection of filler metalwhat would be the testing plan for the welded joint to ensure integrity at such operating pressures?what should be the possible configuration of test samples
 
polka129 said:
working pressure of 280 bar

That sounds like a pretty high pressure. Are there any OSHA regulations or other safety considerations that need to be taken into account? What are the potential liability issues if the weld fails?
 
Crickets. Thread locked as a dangerous discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K