Just a question re high power xray

AI Thread Summary
A recent discussion highlights a Siberian experiment involving a 300 kW electron beam at 5 MeV aimed at efficient x-ray conversion. The potential for industrial applications is emphasized, particularly the possibility of operating at 10% efficiency for x-ray production. The conversation raises the question of whether this method could be more cost-effective than traditional cobalt facilities, which are not x-ray sources but rely on radioactive decay. The discussion also mentions the role of ion beam accelerators in advancing this technology. Overall, the exploration of electron beam technology presents a promising alternative for x-ray generation in various industries.
klystronman
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
i was checking out the web and ran across an experiment in Siberia that had a grant.
the experiment was a 300 kw electron beam at 5 MeV for efficient conversion to xray.
to me this has such an interesting use for industry both electron beam and xray. if it had a 10% efficiency on power used FOR XRAY.

WOULD IT BE CHEAPER TO OPERATE THAN A COBALT FACILITY?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Cobalt is not an x-ray source.
Cobalt-60 undergoes radioactive decay with the emission of beta particles and strong gamma radiation.
http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/radionuclides/cobalt.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
here is an example of what i would think it could replace

http://www.hawaii-county.com/bigislandag/phtsupport.html

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
check out beam one

check out beam one

http://www.beam-one.com/

select electron beam technology then how it works

wait for the animation to start in the black box

this is electron beam for industry

if you add an xray converter to this you have a low power xray source

ion beam accelerators are big on this technology
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top