Just a question regarding Q.M text by griffith.

  • Thread starter Thread starter haplo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffith Text
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of Griffiths' textbook for preparing students for graduate-level quantum mechanics courses. Users express concerns about the book's depth, noting that it may be too simplified and lacking in critical discussions. One participant suggests supplementing Griffiths with Shankar's text for a more comprehensive understanding. Comparisons are made to Robinett's quantum mechanics book, which is perceived as more robust. Overall, there is a consensus that additional resources may be necessary to adequately prepare for graduate studies in quantum mechanics.
haplo
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Wondering if your professor using this as main text, how good will it prepare you for Graduate Q.M course. Would you recommend to simultaneously study material from some other text. I wonder because we are finishing chapter 2 and problems do not seem that challenging, just bunch of integral evaluation and some derivations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I used it for my undergrad Quantum course. It's a terrible book.
 
are you in grad school now?
 
haplo said:
are you in grad school now?
Yes.

I highly recommend picking up something like Shankar to supplement Griffiths. Griffiths' book is, at best, watered down, and at worst, completely lacking important discussions.
 
thats the impression i am having, while comparing it to Q.M by Robinett.

thanks for reply
 

Thread 'Opinions/personal experiences on the following four CompSci books'

For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
View full post »

Thread 'Ashcroft and Mermin: revised edition'

Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
View full post »

Similar threads

Will using Griffith and Purcell benefit a beginner in E&M?
Replies
4
Views
6K
Best Intro to Quantum Mechanics: Griffiths vs Dirac
Replies
33
Views
7K
Linear Algebra What are some recommended second texts for self-studying linear algebra?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Classical Reading Goldstein's Classical Mechanics as an Undergraduate
Replies
33
Views
6K
Classical Prerequisites for Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics
Replies
6
Views
10K
Classical Source recommendation on Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
Classical How many of a chapter's problems do I do before moving to the next chapter?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Good graduate text in quantum mechanics
Replies
6
Views
5K
Same chapters from Griffiths being used for EM1 and EM2?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Studying Regarding learning from Griffiths
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top