Justify if a mass is negligible.

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatguythere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force exerted by the biceps muscle when holding a 3 kg mass, while also questioning the assumption that the mass of the lower arm is negligible. It is argued that even without the external mass, the weight of the lower arm contributes significant force on the biceps, making it not negligible. Data suggests that the average weight of a human forearm and hand is approximately 1.5 kg, which is substantial compared to the held mass. A more precise calculation using integral calculus shows that the arm's weight could increase the required bicep force by about 25%. Thus, the assumption of neglecting the arm's mass is not justified in this scenario.
thatguythere
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A standard man holds an object of mass m = 3 kg on the palm of the hand with the arm stretched, as shown in the figure below.
(a) Use the torque equilibrium equation to determine the magnitude of the force F that is exerted by the biceps muscle, when a = 32 cm,b = 6 cm,and the angle θ = 75°.Neglect the weight of the lower arm.
(b) Is the assumption of a negligible mass of the lower arm in part (a) justified?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Part a) I completed with little difficulty, I wish only some dialogue on the second part. The way I see it is that even if the man were not holding a mass in his hand, the weight of the lower arm itself would still exert some force on the bicep. Therefore, the mass is not in fact negligible. Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 6-p-016.gif
    6-p-016.gif
    6.1 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass of the arm would be negligible if the arm's mass was tiny relative to the weight, thus causing a small (negligible) error in your final calculations. Taking the mean value from some data about arm weight found on the internet, a human forearm and hand weigh about 1.5 kg, 50% of the weight of the object held in the hand. Although this weight is distributed across the length of the lever arm, I'd agree that this isn't negligible.

If you know integral calculus, you could to a pretty accurate calculation of the force from the muscle with the added weight of the arm by making an integral for the torque from the arm. If you assume the forearm has uniform mass, then:
\displaystyle dm=(m/L)dx
where the positive x-axis is along the arm, L is arm length, and m is mass of arm. Then:
\displaystyle dF=g\ dm
\displaystyle dτ=x\ dF
then, substitute to get
\displaystyle dτ=\frac{m·g}{L}·x\ dx
then integrate
\displaystyle τ=\frac{m·g}{L}·\int^L_0x\ dx
this gives:
\displaystyle τ=\frac{m·g·L}{2}

This calculation, along with the arm weight data found on the internet, indicates that the arm weight would increase the torque (and thus the force from the bicep) by about 25%.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top