Kinematics / forces - Young girl swinging on a rope

AI Thread Summary
To determine how high the girl was above the water when she let go of the rope, her initial velocity must be broken into vertical and horizontal components. The vertical component is calculated using the formula 2.65 m/s * sin(35°). With the vertical initial velocity established, the height can be found using the equation d = vi * t + 0.5 * a * t^2, where the time of flight is 1.30 seconds and acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s². This approach effectively combines kinematics and forces to solve the problem. The final height above the water can then be calculated accurately.
Huskies213
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
On a hot summer day a young girl swings on a rope above the local swimming hole. When she let's go of the rope her initial velocity is 2.65 m/s at an angle of 35.0° above the horizontal. If she is in flight for 1.30 s, how high above the water was she when she let go of the rope?

can anyone help?? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve this problem, it is best to set up a chart and draw a picture.
We already know the time is 1.30s and the accleration is 9.81 m/s2 - that's always a given. To get the vertical height, you need a vertical initial velocity. You need to break the velocity they give you into components. Make a right triangle and put that 2.65 at the hypotenuse. Solve for the vertical inital velocity by 2.65sin35.
After that you can plug it into the equation d=vi t +.5 a t^2
This will give you the height.
 
First separate the velocity vector into vertical and horizontal components.
Then use the (known) vertical acceleration and the (known) time
to compute the change in vertical location.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top