Kinematics - free fall/projectile

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhodium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a kinematics problem involving two objects: one thrown upward with an initial velocity and another falling from a height with zero initial velocity. The equations used for the falling object and the upward-moving object were initially incorrect, leading to confusion about their positions at the time of collision. Participants clarified that the correct approach involves expressing both positions in terms of time and ensuring consistent signs for displacement. The final suggestion was to isolate time in one equation and substitute it into the other to find the collision position. This collaborative effort helped the original poster gain clarity on the problem-solving process.
rhodium
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is that basically, if an object is thrown up with a certain initial velocity (v), and an object at height h directly above the first object falls (intial velocity=0), write an equation for the position they collide. (position denoted as x)


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



ok I tried this question so many times (actually about 3 times). This is the equations I used

object 1 (falling down)
-x= -g/2t^2

object 2
h-x= vt - g/2t^2


I isolated them for x, but the answer is wrong. Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my 2 equations?

edited to add: this is what the 2 equations solved to:
x=gh^2/(2v^2)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rhodium said:
-x= -g/2t^2

object 2
h-x= vt - g/2t^2

Hi rhodium! :smile:

If v is measured up, then s must be measured up also,

so the falling one is x= -gt^2/2 (or x = h - gt^2/2 , depending where you're starting from :wink:)

and the other one is … ? :smile:
 
hi,

i am still confused. i put - on the s because the displacement is negative. but sicne the initial position is h, then it would make sense to write it that way. thanks!

ok, so, for equation 2 (object going up), would it be like this:

y=vt-g/2t^2 where x=y?

i hope i got it right.

edited to add:

I isolated for x.
x=h-gh^2/(2v^2)
 
Last edited:
rhodium said:
ok, so, for equation 2 (object going up), would it be like this:

y=vt-g/2t^2 where x=y?

Hi rhodium! :smile:

Yes, if x = h - gt2/2, then y = vt - gt2/2. :smile:
I isolated for x.
x=h-gh^2/(2v^2)

:confused:

No … put x = y, and solve for t … then use that t to get x. :smile:
 
all right,

thank you for teaching me. i was really stuck before.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top