Kinematics in two dimensions problem

AI Thread Summary
A car drives off a 48.1 m high cliff, landing 195 m away from the base. The time of flight is calculated to be 3.13 seconds using the equation for vertical motion under gravity. The horizontal motion is independent of gravity, meaning the initial horizontal velocity must be constant throughout the flight. The correct formula for horizontal distance is used to find the initial velocity, resulting in a speed of 62.3 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the independence of vertical and horizontal motions in projectile motion problems.
ian_durrant
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Kinematics in two dimensions problem

Homework Statement


Chapter 3, Problem 20


Incorrect.

A car drives horizontally off the edge of a cliff that is 48.1 m high. The police at the scene of the accident note that the point of impact is 195 m from the base of the cliff. How fast was the car traveling when it drove off the cliff?


Homework Equations



y=V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2

y=(1/2)(V(0)+V)T- maybe?


The Attempt at a Solution




Ok I think I've figured out the first part of the equation, finding out the time it took for the car to fly off the cliff- here's how I did it.

y= V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2
-48.1= (0)t +(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
t=3.13

Here's where I think I'm messing up somewhere:

x=195 (how far the car flew off the cliff)
t=3.13 (what i got from the previous answer)
V(0)= ? (what i need to solve for)
V= 0 ( the car doesn't have any more veloicty after it crashed into something)

however, when i plug this into my equation :

x=(1/2)(V(0)+V)t, it says i didn't get the right answer. here's my math just for a double check

195=(1/2)(V(0)+0)(3.13)
195=1.57V(0)
V(0)= 124.5

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ian_durrant said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and
V= 0 ( the car doesn't have any more veloicty after it crashed into something)


Remember you have to treat the Y and the X completely different in this case. What would of happened to the car if there was no gravitiy pulling down from the cliff? Would it ever have been stopped by the ground? Would its velocity ever changed (disregarding air resistance). Gravity is only working here in the Y direction.
 
I'm a little confused, wouldn't V=0 on the x-axis if the car had stopped/crashed, but on the Y-axis there still is the force of gravity. Or are you saying that my time i computed for the Y values won't work for my X values?
 
No, the time traveled is the same for both the X and the Y. What I'm trying to convey is the point that the car crashed due to a constant acceleration downward in the Y direction (gravity). The motion of the car in the X direction is completely independent and without gravity would have continued traveling never hitting the ground. This is why using the Vf=0 in the X equation isn't valid (That would imply a negative acceleration which in turn would imply an additional force at work, which there isn't in the X direction). So, you found the travel time from the equations for the Y direction. This time we know has to be the same for the X direction. Also we know the distance the car traveled in the X direction, 195m. Can you figure for Vi from here? (remember there is nothing accelerating the car in the X direction)
 
so it would be a logical assumption that g=0 in the x direction, correct?

so an equaiton would look something like this?

195=V(0)(3.13)+(1/2)(0)(3.13)^2
195=3.13V(0)
V(0)= 62.3 m/s?
 
Looks good to me.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...

Similar threads

Back
Top