Kinematics of a ball and track

AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking to calculate the exit velocity of a 100g ball on a downhill track designed as a cosine curve, with a height of 11 inches and a length of 18 inches. They are uncertain about how to transition from a position-vs-position graph to a position-vs-time graph due to the curve's nature. Responses suggest using conservation of energy principles, equating potential energy to kinetic energy, and factoring in the ball's rolling motion for a more accurate calculation. The discussion highlights the importance of considering the moment of inertia and the ball's point of contact with the track. This information will assist the user in refining their calculations for the ball's exit velocity.
chopperwalker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

New here. I have designed a segment of a track that I am building that I need to pull some data out of. It is a high-to-low transition (down hill) that takes the form of cosine over the domain [0,pi]. Thea graph of the transition's profile is y=5.5cos(xpi/18)+5.5 It is 11 inches high and 18 inches long.

I want to find out its exit velocity (x=18) for a ~100g ball that starts form rest at the top. The graph of the formula I used above is position-vs-position. I know that velocity is the graph of position-vs-time's first derivative.

How do I get from the position-vs-position graph/formula to the position-vs-time graph/formula? I think I could do it if the slope was constant, but I'm not sure about the curve and I don't want to average the slope. Shouldn't it be the same graph, just compressed along the x-axis?

Thanks,
Chopper
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To a first approximation just use conservation of energy. You have PE = mgh and KE = 1/2 mv² so by setting them equal you get

mgh = 1/2 mv²
v = sqrt(2gh)
 
Though to get a more accurate approximation you should account for the rolling of the ball (assuming there is enough friction to prevent it from slipping):

mgh\ =\ \frac{1}{2} mv^2\ +\ \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

Where I is the moment of inertia for a sphere (\frac{2}{5}MR^2) and \omega is \frac{v^2}{R^2}.

Solve that entire equation for v and you should get a more accurate approximation.
 
Note that w^2 is not v^2 / R^2 if the ball running on a pair of rails as opposed to rolling along a surface. w^2 = v^w / r^2, where r is the perpendicular component of distance from center of ball to the surface of the ball where it meets the supporting track.
 
@everyone: Thank you for the input. This will be very helpful. I had considered Inertia and that the point of contact of the ball/track would have an impact, but this is very helpful.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top