Kinematics Physics equation, simple explanation.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a kinematics problem involving passing a slow driver with specific distances and speeds. Participants are trying to manipulate the equation d = vt to incorporate the distances and speeds of both the car and the oncoming truck. There is confusion over how to correctly set up the equation to account for the total distance needed to safely pass, including the lengths of the vehicles. One participant points out that the simplification leads to an incorrect conclusion about the speeds being equal. The conversation highlights the challenges in applying kinematic equations to real-world driving scenarios.
LeopardGecko
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
You are stuck behind a slow driver, there is a 1 km passing lane between a slow car and a truck. In order to properly pass you must be at least 40m from the slow car. You are traveling at 70km/h and there is an oncoming truck traveling at 80km/h. Each car is 4m long. What is the minimum acceleration you would need.

Figuring out the final answer isn't the problem, just the manipulation of the next equation to find maximum time it would take. I don't get how this works out, could somebody should me step by step on how to turn d = vt into:

d = v(car)t + d + v(truck)t

Basically what two equations does he combine together to make this equation up above?

Entering numerical values makes it:

1000m = v(you)t + 44 + v(truck)t
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LeopardGecko said:
d = v(car)t + d + v(truck)t
Are you sure you wrote the same equation as you saw it? This equation simplifies to

v(car) = v(truck)​

which is wrong.
 
Yeah, it is exactly as I saw it. Minus where I added in car and truck in parenthesis, but that was implied by the question.

The next step in the equation is

956 = t(70+80)

Which makes doesn't make sense as this is now the total distance you have to pass when you're beside the other car and doesn't account for the time that you and the truck had moved by the time "your" car had moved up to the "slow car".

It would make sense if when the variables where entered it would be 1044m = t(70+80).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top