Kinematics police car chase question

  • Thread starter Thread starter spizma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a police car that begins accelerating one second after a speeder passes it. The speeder travels at 100 km/h (27.78 m/s), while the police car starts at 80 km/h (22.23 m/s) and accelerates at 2 m/s². After one second, the speeder is 5.55 meters ahead. The correct equation to find the time until the police car catches up is 5.55 + 27.78t = 22.23t + 1t². The calculations confirm that the police car catches the speeder in approximately 6.42 seconds, not the 7.4 seconds stated in the book.
spizma
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A speeder passes with velocity 100 km/h by a police car with velocity 80km/h. Exactly one second after the speeder passes the police car, the police car accelerates with an acceleration of 2 m/s^2. How long is it until the police car passes the speeder.

Homework Equations


x = x_0 + v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

100 km/h = 27.78 m/s
80 km/h = 22.23 m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured out that in the one second before the police car accelerated, the speeder got 5.55 m ahead. I then figured that the distance traveled by the police car from the time it starts accelerating to the time it catches up with the speeder (t) is 5.58 m + (27.78 m/s)*t (the distance between the cars at first, and the distance traveled by the speeder in the time it takes for the police to catch up).

So the equation should be this, right?
5.55 + 27.78 t = 22.23 t + \frac{1}{2} 2 t^2

When I try to solve for that I get t = -.87 s and 6.42 s, but the back of the book says it is 7.4 seconds. What am I doing wrong? Thanks much in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculation is correct. 6.42 sec is the right answer. 7.4 sec will be the solution if t=0 is the instant when speeder passes by the police car.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top