Kinematics: the race that Lance could now win

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantum_enhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Race
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving two racers, Lance and Richard, where Lance has 6 km to cover and Richard is ahead by 4 minutes. The key equations relate their speeds and distances, with Lance speeding up to 2 km/h faster than Richard. A correction in understanding the time advantage is clarified, indicating that Richard's lead means he covered a distance in the 4 minutes it took Lance to reach his current position. The importance of converting time to hours for calculations is emphasized, leading to a clearer formulation of the kinematic equations needed to solve the problem. Understanding the relative positions and speeds is crucial for finding the solution.
quantum_enhan
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
yepp-1.png



Homework Equations


v=d/t


The Attempt at a Solution



VL=VR+2km/h
d=6km
tL1tR+4min
tL2=tR +2

VL= 6km / (2-4) = 3km/min which is OBVIOUSLY WRONG. I have tried numerous things for the past couple hours, but can't seem to figure it out/. Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nobody?
 
Here's what we know:


Lance has 6 km to go; D_L = 6[/tex]<br /> Richard has some unknown distance remaining; D_R[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; At Lance&amp;#039;s current speed (V_{L1}[/tex]), it will take him 4 min to reach Richard&amp;amp;#039;s current position (6 - D_R[/tex])&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; Therefore, 4V_{L1} = 6 - D_R[/tex]&amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; But instead, Lance speeds up to 2 km/hr faster than Richard (V_{L2} = V_R + 2[/tex])&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; At this speed, Richard will reach the finish line 2 min. before Lance (V_{L2}t =6[/tex], and V_R(t-2) = D_R[/tex])
 
Correction?

I believe that the statement that Richard is 4 minutes ahead of Lance, is to mean that it took Richard 4 minutes to cover the distance currently between them.

Therefore 6 - D_R = 4V_R[/tex] <b>not</b> 6 - D_R = 4 V_{L1}[/tex]
 
Whoops! We need to get our units straight. It's probably best to convert distances to km and times to hours in order to keep numbers small

4 min = \frac{1}{15}hr[/tex]<br /> <br /> 2 min = \frac{1}{30}hr[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; So,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; D_L = 6&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \frac{V_R}{15} = 6 - D_R&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; V_L = V_R + 2&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; V_Lt = 6&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; V_R(t - \frac{1}{30}) = D_R
 
Last edited:
zgozvrm said:
Correction?

I believe that the statement that Richard is 4 minutes ahead of Lance, is to mean that it took Richard 4 minutes to cover the distance currently between them.

Therefore 6 - D_R = 4V_R[/tex] <b>not</b> 6 - D_R = 4 V_{L1}[/tex]
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Yes! If Richard is 4 minutes ahead of Lance, that means that 4 minutes ago, Richard was where Lance is now. So, during that 4 minutes, Richard covered a distance of V_R \times 4min[/tex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Think of an observer sitting on the side of the course. When Richard passes by, he starts his stopwatch. When Lance finally passes that same point, he finds that 4 minutes have elapsed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Understanding this is key to being able to answer the question (followed by the ability to correctly write out the kinematic equations using the data given). When solved, you&amp;amp;#039;ll find that you get nice, neat numbers.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top