Kinetic Energy and Colliding Blocks

AI Thread Summary
A 2.4 kg block with 48 J of kinetic energy collides with a second block at rest, resulting in a combined kinetic energy of 36 J after sticking together. The initial speed of the first block is calculated to be 5.98 m/s. The error in the original calculation stems from incorrectly applying the conservation of kinetic energy instead of the conservation of momentum, as some energy is lost during the inelastic collision. To find the mass of the second block, momentum conservation must be used alongside the calculated velocities. The correct mass of the second block is determined to be 0.80 kg.
mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
A 2.4 kg block with a kinetic energy of 48 J slides on a horizontal frictionless table and collides with a second block. The second block is made of a different material and is initially at rest. The two blocks stick together and after the collision have a kinetic energy of 36 J. Find the mass of the second block.

What I did was first find the speed of the first block:
1/2MV^2=48
V[1,i]=5.98
Then the sum of their kinetic energies at the end is just 36. I use that sum to isolate for M[2], and I get .38, which is the incorrect answer. The correct answer is .80 kg. Any idea what I'm doing wrong or what I'm supposed to do? I'm practicing for an exam and this question was one of the old test questions.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Man what happened to this forum..this thing used to actually be helpful
 
Kinetic energy is not conserved (some of the energy is lost to heat when the blocks stick together). You need to use conservation of momentum.

(You can use KE = (1/2)mv2 as a way of finding the velocities, but the rest of the problem is conservation of momentum, not energy.)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top