Kinetic energy and normal force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving kinetic energy, normal force, and acceleration on a slope. Key points include the need to apply conservation of energy to find kinetic energy at the bottom of the hill, rather than calculating speed directly. The normal force is defined as perpendicular to the slope, and its magnitude can be determined without needing to specify direction. Participants clarify that net acceleration is indeed the sum of forces divided by mass, although there is some debate over terminology. Overall, the focus is on applying fundamental physics concepts to solve the problem effectively.
Rowie25
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You and your sled have a mass of 100 kg and starting from rest, slide down a very icy and frictionless road which is 20 degrees steep and 200 m long.
a. What is your kinetic energy at the bottom of the hill?
b. What is your net acceleration?
c. How long does it take you to slide to the bottom?
d. What is the normal force exerted on you and your sled?
At the bottom of the hill you change direction but not your speed and go up a hill which is 30 degrees steep and with friction coefficient .1.
e. What distance along the hill do you go before stopping?

I am not sure how to start this one. I think you have to find the speed first since KE=(1/2)mv^2. I think normal force is mgcos(angle)yhat but I don't know how to find yhat. Also is net acceleration the sum of all forces divided by the mass? I'm stuck!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rowie25 said:
I am not sure how to start this one. I think you have to find the speed first since KE=(1/2)mv^2.
Speed is not needed, this is a conservation-of-energy question. You can check your textbook for the relevant equation if you do not know it.
I think normal force is mgcos(angle)yhat but I don't know how to find yhat.
It's universally agreed that the normal force's direction is perpendicular to the sloping surface (by definition), so it should suffice to give it's magnitude.
Also is net acceleration the sum of all forces divided by the mass? I'm stuck!
Yes, that is what they are asking for. Personally I dislike the term "net acceleration", an object only has one acceleration even if there are several forces acting on it. Just my opinion.
 
Ohh okay thank you! I'll work on it!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top