Kinetic Energy Formula definition explanation

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic energy formula, KE = 1/2 mv², illustrates that kinetic energy depends on both mass and the square of velocity. The squaring of velocity reflects the relationship between speed and energy, emphasizing that energy increases significantly with speed. The constant 1/2 arises from integrating the work done on an object under constant acceleration. This integration connects force, mass, and displacement, leading to the derivation of the kinetic energy equation. Understanding these components clarifies the relationship between motion and energy in classical mechanics.
Selina94
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand how this equation was came together, mainly, I hardly understand why velocity is squared, and why there's the constant of '1/2'.


Homework Equations


In classical mechanics, the kinetic energy of a point object (an object so small that its mass can be assumed to exist at one point), or a non-rotating rigid body depends on the mass of the body as well as its speed. The kinetic energy is equal to the mass multiplied by the square of the speed, multiplied by the constant 1/2. In formula form:
11e6fc84bb2641d36b09c5a6359f7c08.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work done on an object and one of the equation of motion for constant acceleration :

V^2 - U^2 = 2AD (A= acceleration vector)(D= Displacement vector)(the rest is self explanatory)
W=F.D
 
Integrate the righthand side of
$$\int \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \int m\vec{a}\cdot d\vec{r}$$ using the chain rule to write ##a_i = \frac{d v_i}{dt} = \frac{dv_i}{dx_i}\frac{dx_i}{dt}##.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top