Kinetic Energy in water and the rate carried across each square meter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic energy in a cubic meter of seawater flowing at 2.5 m/s, with seawater density at approximately 1030 kg/m3. Participants seek the appropriate equations for kinetic energy and the mass of seawater in the specified volume. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the formulas to determine kinetic energy and the flow's impact on energy extraction potential. There is an emphasis on understanding the theoretical limits of energy extraction from ocean currents. Overall, the thread underscores the importance of foundational physics concepts in analyzing oceanic kinetic energy.
annie05
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Consider an ocean current flowing at 2.5m/s
a) How much kinetic energy is contained in a cubic volume of water that measures 1m on each side? The density of seawater is about 1030kg/m3
b) If the flow is perpendicular to one of the cube faces, what is the rate at which the current carries kinetic energy across each square metre? Your answer gives an upper limit for the power that could be extracted from the flow, although it is an unrealistic limit because you’d have to stop the entire flow

2. I am not sure of which equations to use


3. No attempted solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the formula for kinetic energy?

What's the mass of 1 m^3 of seawater?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top