Kinetic Energy/Momentum from change in direction and speed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a truck's change in momentum and kinetic energy as it accelerates while turning. The context is rooted in concepts from kinematics and dynamics, specifically focusing on vector quantities and energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the formulas for momentum and kinetic energy to calculate changes in these quantities. There are attempts to resolve vector components of momentum and questions about unit consistency and directionality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations for kinetic energy and momentum, while others are questioning the correctness of their units and the method for resolving momentum as a vector. There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the problem, with no clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of converting units and resolving vector directions, indicating potential gaps in understanding the vector nature of momentum compared to the scalar nature of kinetic energy.

threewingedfury
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
From a calculus based physics course:

A 2100 kg truck that travels north at 41 km/hr is turning east and accelerating to 60 km/hr
-What are the magnitudes and direction of change in the trucks momentum?
- What is the change in the trucks kinetic energy?

I need some help on steps - because I'm lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
momentum p = mv. Use this to work out the magnitudes of the vectors, then resolve the vector system.
K.E. = 1/2mv^2
 
would the change in KE be:
KE = .5mv^2
KE1 = .5(2100)(41km/hr * 0.277777778 m/s)^2
KE2 = .5(2100)(60km/hr * .277777778 m/s)^2
KE1-KE2 = 136192.132-291666.671
KE=-155474.54
 
and the momentum would be
p =mv
p1 = 2100*41km/hr
p2 = 2100*60km/hr
p1-p2 =-39900 kg*km/hr
Are those the right units? Or does it need to be in m/s?
Would the direction change be east? that's where I'm lost, or would it be the negative direction?
 
Last edited:
so am I right, or really wrong?
 
KE is right since it's just a scalar. Momentum is a vector so you need to resolve it.
 
but how exactly would you do that unless you multiply the mass to the velocity?

I tried the average of the 2 velocities, but that's not right
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K