Kinetic energy of a sled question

AI Thread Summary
A sled with mass m coasts on ice when a package of equal mass m is dropped onto it, prompting a discussion on the kinetic energy comparison before and after the impact. Initially, the sled's kinetic energy is calculated as 1/2mv^2. After the package lands, the combined mass moves at half the original sled's velocity, leading to a new kinetic energy of 1/4mv^2. This shows that the kinetic energy of the sled plus the load is half of the original kinetic energy of the sled. The solution emphasizes the importance of applying conservation of momentum to accurately determine the final velocity and kinetic energy.
hey123a
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sled of mass m is coasting on the icy surface of a frozen river. While it is passing under a bridge, a package of equal mass m is dropped straight down and lands on the sled (without causing any damage). The sled plus the added load then continue along the original line of motion. How does the kinetic energy of the (sled + load) compare with the original kinetic energy of the sled? A) It is 1/4 the original kinetic energy of the sled. B) It is 1/2 the original kinetic energy of the sled. C) It is 3/4 the original kinetic energy of the sled. D) It is the same as the original kinetic energy of the sled. E) It is twice the original kinetic energy of the sled.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


kinetic energy intial = 1/2mv^2
kinetic energy after = 1/2(2m)v^2 = mv^2

comparing the kinetic energy before and after, i get the after is twice the original kinetic energy of the sled but apparently this is wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot to conserve momentum.
 
You will need to use conservation of linear momentum to calculate the velocity of the sled+load after the impact as your attempt shows them traveling at the same velocity.

If before the impact, the sled has momentum mu and after it travels with the velocity 'v' and the load is initially at rest, then using conservation of linear momentum what is v in terms of u?
 
ah okay i think i got it
m1v1o + m2v2o = (m1+m2)vf
where m1 is the sled, and m2 a mass that is equal to the sled
m1v1o = (m1+m2)vf
m1v1o = 2mvf
m1v1o/2m = vf
v1o/2 = vf

original ke = 1/2mv^2
KE of sled + load = 1/2(2m)(v1o/2)^2
ke of sled + load = 1/2(2m)(v^2/4 = 1/4mv^2, which is 1/2 the original kinetic energy of the sled
 
Well done.

It's easier to check your answers if you get formal with the working.
for instance, if I write:

before:
momentum: ##p_i=mu##
kinetic energy: ##K_i=\frac{1}{2}mu^2##

after:
momentum: ##p_f=2mv##
kinetic energy: ##K_f = mv^2##

conservation of momentum:
##p_f=p_i\implies 2mv=mu \implies v=u/2\\ \qquad \implies K_f=\frac{1}{4}mu^2##

Comparing KE "after" with KE "before":
$$\frac{K_f}{K_i}=\frac{\frac{1}{4}mu^2}{\frac{1}{2}mu^2}=\frac{1}{2} \\ \qquad\implies K_f=\frac{1}{2}K_i$$

You can see all the steps and most of the reasoning.
Good for long answers or when you are practicing (or writing questions here ;) ) - but probably more work than you'd like for a simple multi-choice.

Still... no worries aye?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top