Solving the Jump Height Mystery: How to Calculate with Unknown Mass

AI Thread Summary
To determine how high a sprinter running at 10 meters per second could jump by converting kinetic energy into gravitational potential energy, the formula KE = 1/2 mv^2 can be used. The mass cancels out when equating kinetic energy to potential energy (1/2 mv^2 = mgh), leading to the simplified equation h = 1/2(v^2/g). Plugging in the values gives a jump height of approximately 5.1 meters. The discussion emphasizes that the problem is a hypothetical scenario and may not be explicitly covered in textbooks. Overall, understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy is key to solving this type of physics problem.
celect
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
The question is:

If a sprinter running at 10 meters per second could convert his
kinetic energy into upward motion, how high could he jump?

How do I solve this if I use the KE = 1/2 mv^2

I don't know what the mass is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine all of that kinetic energy converted into gravitational potential energy. If you solve for the height, I think you'll find that the mass of the sprinter cancels out.
 
So are you saying I should:

1/2 mv^2 = mgh
1/2 v^2/g=h
1/2(10^2/9.8)=5.1m

The textbook I have in no way explains this, if this is correct
where can I get other sources of help on physics
 
Yes, that's what I'm saying. I wouldn't expect your textbook to explain exactly the solution to this problem, especially if it is an exercise from there. As long as it explains about kinetic and potential energy, I wouldn't be too worried. The problem asks about an isolated "what-if" situation. What if instead of running at 10m/s, the sprinter jumped with an initial upward velocity of 10 m/s. I don't think there's anything more to read into the problem than that (which is why I don't think it's a problem if your textbook doesn't say anything about situations like this).
 
Thanks, I was searching for an answer that I would never find.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top