Kinetics Question: Rate of Reaction at 0.503 M

  • Thread starter Thread starter davev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rate of a reaction given specific concentrations of reactants A and B. The reaction follows the rate law rate = k[A][B]^2, with a known slope from a plot of ln[A] versus time, indicating a first-order reaction for A. The correct rate of the reaction when both [A] and [B] are at 0.503 M is determined to be 0.348 M/s. Participants discuss the relevance of an ICE table for this problem, concluding it is unnecessary. The focus remains on understanding the impact of initial concentrations on the reaction rate.
davev
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the following reaction at 282 K.

2 A + 2 B → C + D​

where rate = rate=k[A]2. An experiment was performed for a certain number of seconds where [A]0 = 0.000303 M and 0 = 1.63 M. A plot of ln[A] vs time had a slope of -7.27. What will the rate of this reaction be when [A] = = 0.503 M?

Rate (M/s)=

The correct answer is 0.348 M/s.

Homework Equations


I'm not sure where to start here, but I tried using these equations, because I was given the slope, and the slope for ln[A] vs time is given in a first order reaction:

ln[A]t = -kt + ln[A]o
Rate = k[A]
k = -slope


The Attempt at a Solution


Basically I just tried plugging into k = 7.27 into rate=k[A]2 were [A] and are both 0.503 M.

Thank you for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the values of [A] and at the beginning of the experiment. From the specified stoichiometry, how much do you think the concentration of is going to change relative to its initial value during the experiment? Will this really be significant?

Chet
 
Oh, do I have to use an ICE table?
 
davev said:
Oh, do I have to use an ICE table?
I don't know what an ICE table is, but, whatever it is, you don't need to use it on this problem.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
I don't know what an ICE table is, but, whatever it is, you don't need to use it on this problem.

Chet

ICE as in initial concentration, change in concentration, and end concentration.

How do you solve this problem?
 
davev said:
ICE as in initial concentration, change in concentration, and end concentration.

How do you solve this problem?
The solution to this problem starts out by reconsidering the questions I asked in post #2. Let me ask in another way. If B had reacted with all the A in the experiment, what would its final concentration have been? What percentage change would this have made in the concentration of B?

Chet
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top