[Kinetics] Using Rate as a Conversion Factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter brbrett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetics Rate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the decomposition of ozone and the calculation of oxygen molecules produced per liter per day. The initial calculations yield a result of approximately 5.071248 x 10^25 molecules/L, which the student believes is correct, while the textbook states 5.1 x 10^25 as the answer. Participants suggest that the discrepancy may stem from a typographical error in the textbook, as the calculated answer aligns closely with the expected result. The conversation highlights the importance of unit consistency and the potential for errors in educational materials. Overall, the student’s understanding of stoichiometry and mole conversions is affirmed despite the confusion over the textbook's answer.
brbrett
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Certain pollutants encourage the following decomposition of ozone: 2O 3(g) -> 3O 2(g), at a rate of 6.5 x 10-4 M O 3/s. How many molecules of O2 gas are formed in each litre of atmosphere every day by this process? (As this problem provides a rate in units of mol/L/s and requires molecules/L as an answer, we can simply leave the unit "L" in the denominator the entire time.)

Homework Equations


Stoichiometry, mole conversions, Mole concentration (molarity)

The Attempt at a Solution


2O 3(g) -> 3O 2(g)
6.5 E 23 * 3/2 = 0.000975molO2
0.000975moleO2/s * 6.02*1023/1mol * 86400/day = 5.071248 E 25
This answer is not correct according to my book. The book says the answer is 5.1 * 1025 molecules/L. Not sure why they didn't mention days in the answer, considering how that is part of the question.

I appreciate any help! I only just started learning this, and may have forgotten something regarding stoichiometry since I haven't done it for a couple of months. Please avoid telling the steps, since I want to understand it~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brbrett said:

Homework Statement


How many molecules of O2 gas are formed in each litre of atmosphere every day by this process? (As this problem provides a rate in units of mol/L/s and requires molecules/L as an answer, we can simply leave the unit "L" in the denominator the entire time.)

The Attempt at a Solution


2O 3(g) -> 3O 2(g)
6.5 E 23 * 3/2 = 0.000975molO2
0.000975moleO2/s * 6.02*1023/1mol * 86400/day = 5.071248 E 25
This answer is not correct according to my book. The book says the answer is 5.1 * 1025 molecules/L. Not sure why they didn't mention days in the answer, considering how that is part of the question.
~
so I think the problem is with the units only? numerically your answer is same as the answer given in the book .Your attempt is also right ..
First you calculated the moles of O2 released per L in one second.Then you converted it for per day.You can drop the unit of time ..because they are asking in one day how many molecules of gas is released per L ...in the book answer provided is in molecules /L in one day.
 
I did think I was right. Just looked, and it seems there is a typo in the book. It says 5.1 x 1025, but if you change it to 5.1 x 10^25, it matches my answer (or close enough anyways). Gotta love it when textbook answers aren't proofread... >.>
 
some how I thought it as a typo error on this forum ...I thought you are asking why they did not use per day in the unit.
 
brbrett said:
I did think I was right. Just looked, and it seems there is a typo in the book. It says 5.1 x 1025, but if you change it to 5.1 x 10^25, it matches my answer (or close enough anyways). Gotta love it when textbook answers aren't proofread... >.>
I'm almost certain that the 5.1 x 1025 in your book is a typo. Their answer is a bit over 5000, and I doubt anyone would write that number as 5.1 x 1025. 5.1 x 1025 makes sense to me.

Lots of science and math books have incorrect answers, especially the more advanced ones. I've seen books that had the text formatted in one edition, but in a later edition, someone dropped the ball on formatting.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top