Kirchhoff's current law and nodal analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using Kirchhoff's current law and nodal analysis to determine the current I in a given circuit. The user initially calculated a current of 35/22 A using Kirchhoff's voltage law but encountered issues when applying Kirchhoff's current law, resulting in contradictory equations. They derived four equations but ended up with a nonsensical value for I, which raised confusion. Other participants suggest clarifying the circuit diagram and ensuring the equations align logically. The consensus is that the problem is straightforward, and proper formulation of the equations is crucial for accurate results.
jonmondalson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm looking to work out the current at I in the following circuit using Kirchoff's current law and nodal analysis:
[PLAIN]http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/4792/circuitgem.jpg

Using Kirchoff's voltage law (and loop analysis), I got a current of (35/22)A, but for the current law method I'm having problems.

I obtained the following equations using Kirchoff's current law:
4i1+2i2+4i3=5
-4i3-2i4=-10
and nodal analysis:
-i2+i3-i4=0
i1+i4=I

But solving these 4 equations produces a value for I of 0, which doesn't make sense, let alone agree with the answer using the other method.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I got as far as your first equation and have no idea how you got it. (Actually, I think I know, but it's nonsensical)

Try drawing the I's and V's out on the diagram and writing equations that make sense.

It's a VERY straightforward problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top