Kirchhoff's Current Law Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter zack7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework question related to Kirchhoff's Current Law, specifically concerning a circuit with three resistors connected in parallel. The user is struggling to derive the correct equations for the current through each resistor and has calculated a total current of 2.4mA, which they believe is incorrect. Participants clarify that the effective resistance for parallel resistors is calculated using the reciprocal formula and suggest that the "10A" markings in the circuit diagram likely indicate range settings for ammeters rather than actual current values. The importance of understanding the circuit diagram conventions is emphasized for accurate analysis. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in circuit analysis and the application of Kirchhoff's principles.
zack7
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I can't seem to solve the question. I know one of the equations is

IT=+IR1+IR2+IR3

but for the other three loops I get the same equation just that the IR is different

Anyone has a idea on how to solve?

[PLAIN]http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6356/doentoi.jpg
Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In what fashion are the three resistors connected (series or parallel)? What do you know about the relationship between voltage or current for components connected in such fashion?
 
gneill said:
In what fashion are the three resistors connected (series or parallel)? What do you know about the relationship between voltage or current for components connected in such fashion?

the resistors are in parallel and thus the effective resistance is the reciprocal of the total of all three resistors

i got 2.4mA for the total current which looks incorrect
 
zack7 said:
the resistors are in parallel and thus the effective resistance is the reciprocal of the total of all three resistors

i got 2.4mA for the total current which looks incorrect

Looks fine to me!
 
gneill said:
Looks fine to me!

but then what about the 10 ampere currents
 
zack7 said:
but then what about the 10 ampere currents

Those boxes would seem to be representations of current meters (ammeters) inserted to measure the current in the various circuit branches. I take it that the "10A" indications inside each of them are not the actual current values (else why would you be asked to calculate them?). Could be that they represent a "range setting" for the meters.

Where does the diagram come from? If it's a book, it should somewhere describe the conventions used for its circuit diagrams and notations.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top