Solving Kirchoff's Rules Homework: Questions on Dimmer/Normal/On/Off

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chewy0087
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a homework problem related to Kirchhoff's Rules, specifically regarding the states of different circuits (dimmer, normal, off). The user expresses confusion about the reasoning behind the answers provided by their teacher, particularly for parts c and d. Another participant suggests using resistor and voltage source combinations instead of Kirchhoff's laws, emphasizing a problem-solving approach based on inspection rather than arithmetic. They clarify that if there is no voltage difference between two points, no current will flow, thus preventing a lamp from glowing. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the explanation provided.
Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



kirchoff.jpg


Homework Equations



Kirchoff's Rules

The Attempt at a Solution



hey there!

i'm having trouble with parts of the question above;

for the first two
a: dimmer, b: normal.

however for c & d I'm confused, I did ask my teacher however he wasn't helpful at all, he told me that c would be normal and d would be "off" however I really don't understand why. I think it might be due to kirchhoffs law's however again i find it difficult to understand, could anyone tell me why d wouldn't be on?

i also encounter the same problem with g & h, i guess I'm not sure how to treat it when there's a line between the batteries.

any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't use Kirchhoff's laws to solve this problem. I would use the rules for combining resistors and combining voltage sources into series and parallel combinations. It's really a problem to solve by inspection,with no arithmetic. But if you want to solve it with Kircchhoff's laws, write down the equations.
 
Can you see that in the second diagram the voltage at a point between the two batteries is the same as that between the two lamps, relative to either end of the two battery string?

So, if you have two places with no voltage between them, you will not get a current to flow if you put a wire between them? And you won't get a lamp to glow either?

In the last diagram, this is the case, too, but since the wire in the middle can't be carrying a current, you can ignore it or just remove it.
 
Last edited:
vk6kro said:
Can you see that in the second diagram the voltage at a point between the two batteries is the same as that between the two lamps, relative to either end of the two battery string?

So, if you have two places with no voltage between them, you will not get a current to flow if you put a wire between them? And you won't get a lamp to glow either?

In the last diagram, this is the case, too, but since the wire in the middle can't be carrying a current, you can ignore it or just remove it.

that's a great explanation, much obliged sir
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top