Kirchoff's Rule(How do I find equivalent resistance?)

AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent resistance in the given circuit, it's essential to correctly identify which resistors are in series and parallel, as simply adding resistances won't work due to the circuit's complexity. The user provided loop equations and current values but initially misunderstood the method for calculating equivalent resistance. It's highlighted that recognizing the configuration of resistors is crucial, and there are additional resistors that can simplify the process. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing effort in problem-solving rather than seeking direct answers. Ultimately, understanding the circuit's layout leads to a clearer path for calculating equivalent resistance.
jawhnay
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please take a look at the attachment to see the circuit. My question is how do I find the equivalent resistance of this circuit? I have done the other two parts but this part has got me stumped. I also drew my currents on the picture.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to categorize which resistors were in parallel and in series to each other but that just got me really confused... If anyone can walk me through this problem it would be greatly appreciated.

Here are my loop equations:

-9I1+3I2+9I3+8I4 = -12
-3I3 = -12
-6I1-4I2+6I3+6I4 = -12
-I1+I2+I3-5I4 = -12

I1 = 7.324841
I2 = 0.878981
I3 = 4
I4 = 1.910828

current across the 5 ohm resistor = 1.911 amps
Vab = -8.484 volts
 

Attachments

  • kirchoff.png
    kirchoff.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 583
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to write loop equations? You need to show some effort on your own so we know where you are stumped. Just giving the answer is against forum rules.

EDIT: "walking you through it" is equivalent to giving the answer. We're more into hints.
 
yes, I know how to write loop equations. However, I thought the equivalent resistance was just adding up the resistances so I didn't think I would need to show my loop equations. I have edited my first post with the loop equations and edited picture.
 
Last edited:
Since you have the current being drawn out of the 12V supply, you have the equivalent resistance, yes?

The problem is that "adding up the resistances" just doesn't work unless everything is simple series/parallel combinations and you've already figured out that that is not the case with this circuit else you would have been able to do it.
 
oh my gosh, I cannot believe I didn't see it. Thank you for the help!
 
Last edited:
phinds said:
Since you have the current being drawn out of the 12V supply, you have the equivalent resistance, yes?

The problem is that "adding up the resistances" just doesn't work unless everything is simple series/parallel combinations and you've already figured out that that is not the case with this circuit else you would have been able to do it.

Actually, if you note that there are "missing" resistors on the diagonals you might see that direct simplification is quite possible. Easy in fact :smile:

attachment.php?attachmentid=58108&stc=1&d=1366631112.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.1 KB · Views: 717
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top