Kittel Chapter 7: Explaining Energy Gaps with First Brillioun Zone

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] kittel chapter 7

Homework Statement


This question relates to Kittel's solid-state physics book. I have edition 8.

I just do not understand how the first Brillioun zone relates to energy gaps. For example, in Figure 2, I do not understand the shape of the curve in Figure 2. I do understand what is going on in Figure 3, but it seems to me like that is a completely different way of explaining energy gaps.

In the caption below figure 2, what exactly does it that the "energy gap E_g is associated with the first Bragg reflection at ... " ? I thought Bragg reflection had to do with light getting diffracted when you send a beam of it into the crystal (e.g. x-ray diffraction). I have absolutely no idea why Bragg reflection is is being talked about here!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bragg reflection can be done with ANY wave. So anything that have a k-vector can be bragg reflected.

remember that the section about light diffraction in ch 2, nothing was said what the wave was composed of.

And this is why you are lead to impose the standing waves, and fig 3.. as a helped you with earlier this week.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top