I Klein-Gordon Operator: Creating Particles at Position x

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Klein Operator
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I read that the Klein-Gordon field can be viewed as an operator that in position space, when acted upon vacuum at position x creates a particle at position x: ##\phi(x) |0 \rangle \propto |x \rangle##. It make sense intuitively and the mathematical derivation is fine too, but I was wondering what does it physically means, as according to uncertainty principle, you can't have a localized particle. So what exactly does it mean to create a particle at position x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can localise a particle as much as you like. Uncertainity principle only tells you that your knowledge about the momentum of the particle will decrease the more you localise it.
 
DrDu said:
You can localise a particle as much as you like. Uncertainity principle only tells you that your knowledge about the momentum of the particle will decrease the more you localise it.
I know this. But based on this definition of Klein-Gordon operator, you know the position of particle with 0 error, which means that you should know the momentum with infinite error, which is, the particle can have any momentum from 0 to infinity. But this is not possible, as the particle can't travel faster than light and you know the mass of the particle as you know what particle you create, and the particle is not virtual, so its mass is known (of course with a certain uncertainty, but again a finite one). Is this logic wrong?
 
The momentum of a relativistic particle can get as large as you like, yet it's velocity is always smaller than c.
Namely ## p=\frac{mv}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}##.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top