Kleppner & Kolenkow 4.7: Ring & Beads Rise if m>3M/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter TGupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion of Kleppner and Kolenkow's problem 4.7, it is established that a ring will rise if the mass of the beads exceeds 3M/2. The beads exert a radial force on the ring, which includes a vertical component that can change direction. As the beads slide down, they may lose contact with the ring, altering the force dynamics. The key condition for the ring's ascent is that the vertical component of the force from the beads must surpass the weight of the ring. Understanding these forces is crucial to solving the problem effectively.
TGupta
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This problem is Kleppner and Kolenkow's 4.7. A ring of mass M hangs from a thread, and two beads of mass m slide on it without friction. The beads are released simultaneously from the top of the ring and slide down opposite sides. Show that the ring will start to rise if m>3M/2, and find the angle at which this occurs.

Now is it not the case that, the beads exert a force on the ring which is radial in direction and has a vertical component which is directed downwards always? If that is true how can the ring go up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGupta said:
Now is it not the case that, the beads exert a force on the ring which is radial in direction and has a vertical component which is directed downwards always?

No. Suppose the beads were sliding round the edge of a solid circular disk, instead of being on a wire.

At some point before they reach the bottom (in fact, before they reach the halfway point), the beads would lose contact with the disk.

So the radial force between the wire and the beads will change from "inwards" to "outwards" at some point. The question is asking for the condition that the vertical component of that force is greater than the weight of the ring.
 
Yep, got it. Thank you very much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top