Know the total resistance of the whole circuit

AI Thread Summary
In a series DC circuit with two identical bulbs, both light up equally bright, but one bulb alone shines brighter. The discussion explores why the bulb closest to the negative end doesn't light up brighter than the other, suggesting that electrons do not instantly adjust to changes in resistance. It compares electrical flow to a river, noting that changes in resistance affect the entire circuit over time, similar to how a river adjusts flow after an obstruction. The analogy emphasizes that energy loss occurs upstream, affecting downstream flow. Overall, the conversation highlights misconceptions about how current and resistance interact in a circuit.
ArielGenesis
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
please feel free to move this thread as i cannot find the correct place.


in a series (dc), when two bulb of the same resistance is used, the two bulbs lighted up as bright. when one bulb is used instead of two, the bulb ligth up brighter.

if again, two bulb arrange in circuit, why not the bulb nearrer to the negative end light up brighter then the next one. it seems that the electron already know the total resistance of the whole circuit at the first bulb to decide the amount of energy relesed at the bulb.

am i messing up some where?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A circuit can only have one amperage just as a river can only have one flowrate. Tossing a massive rock into a river doesn't make the rest of the river instantly "know" the flowrate has changed, there is a short delay as the flow through the entire river adjusts to the change, starting at the point where the change was made. Same goes for electricity: if you suddenly attached a second light, the circuit would not react instantly to the change.
 
It would react pretty quick though!
 
by using water, for example the brightness of the lamp is equal to the erosion of rock.

in the first place, when there is a boulder at the high land, it slows down current after the river or decreasing it's volume. and so when there is another boulder at the low land, it won't be eroded as much as the high land as it already lost it's energy.

a bad example actuallly, but i couldn't find a better one.
 
If the river flows at the same rate all the way along (as current does in a circuit) the rock erosion would be identical everywhere!
 
no, i meant that it flow slower down stream as the energy had been used upstream
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top