Lab Calculations: How to Find Theoretical Yield

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasMagnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations Lab
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the theoretical yield of fumaric and maleic acids from the reaction involving maleic anhydride, one must first establish a balanced chemical equation. The discussion highlights that the theoretical yield is determined by the limiting reagent, which in this case is maleic anhydride. The participant notes discrepancies in their data, as the amount of impure fumaric acid exceeds that of pure maleic acid, indicating a potential error in the experiment. To find the percent yield, one should calculate the moles of the limiting reagent, determine the theoretical yield based on a 100% yield assumption, and then compare it to the actual yield obtained. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurate lab reporting and analysis.
ThomasMagnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello,

I'm looking for some help on how to perform some lab calculations. We recently did a lab on the Preparation of Geometric Isomers. We were preparing the Cis and Trans isomers of butenedioic acid, i.e Fumaric and Maleic Acid. The Maleic acid was done by reacting Maleic anhydride with water, and the Fumaric acid was obtained by using the maleic acid filtrate and a reflux apparatus with HCl. Here is the data I obtained:

Maleic Anhydride Used: 4.99g
Impure Fumaric Acid: 1.24g
Pure Fumaric Acid: 0.82g
Pure Maleic Acid: 0.78g
8mL was added to the anhydride and heated at the beginning

I am supposed to calculate the theoretical yield for the experiment, but I cannot seem to find a balanced equation to use. I believe I am supposed to calculate the amount of product (fumaric+maleic) that can be produced from 4.99g of Maleic Anhydride. I also think that for every 1 mol of Maleic acid, there should be 1 mol of Fumaric produced (since they are isomers).


Homework Equations



C4H2O3 + H2O →C4H4O4


The Attempt at a Solution



Is this how I would go about it?

C4H2O3 + H2O →C4H4O4

Calculate the amount of Maleic acid produced (using the anhydride as the limiting reagent), and since the fumaric is just an isomer, this should be the theoretical yield?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The theoretical yield for what? It seems from the description given that the goal of the lab was to start with maleic anhydride, hydrate to get maleic acid, then isomerize to get fumaric acid. But your numbers don't work out (given the fact that you report more fumaric acid than maleic acid, and even 100% yield would give you at most the same amount).

To answer generally how one would find the percent yield of a reaction, you start with a balanced chemical equation and the mass (or concentration) of your starting materials, then you determine how many moles of the limiting reagent you start with. You use this number along with the balanced equation to determine how many moles of the final product you would end up with if you had a perfect 100% yield. This number is your theoretical yield. Then you use the mass (or concentration) of the final product you obtain to get a number of moles for your final product. This is your actual yield. Divide actual by theoretical and multiply by 100 to get the percent yield.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top