Lab exploring tIV=mcΔT (water heated using heating coil)

  • Thread starter Thread starter clarissalehne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Heating Lab
AI Thread Summary
The lab focused on determining the specific heat capacity of water by heating 100ml with a 4A current through a heating coil, resulting in a temperature rise that plateaued just below 100 degrees Celsius. The initial expectation was that the graph of IV (current times voltage) against ΔT (change in temperature) would be linear, but it instead followed a logarithmic regression. The researcher noted that plotting IV against LN(ΔT) yielded a linear graph, prompting questions about the data's validity and the nature of the relationship. Clarifications were sought regarding the definitions of time (t) and temperature (T) in the experiment. The discussion emphasizes the need for understanding the relationship between these variables to accurately calculate the specific heat capacity.
clarissalehne
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Specific Heat Capacity Lab

I conducted a lab where I heated 100ml of water using a heating coil with a current of 4A passing through it. The temperature data turned out beautifully, with the temperature rising evenly until it plateaued just under 100 degrees celsius as it began to change phase.

My aim was to find the specific heat capacity of the water by graphing IV (current times voltage) against ΔT (change in temperature) as this would give me a slope equal to mc/t.

Theory:
P=VI
P/t=Q
Q=tVI
Q=mcΔT

--> tVI=mcΔT

Strangely though, the graph of IV vs. ΔT is not linear but follows a logarithmic regression. When I plot IV vs. LN(ΔT) I get a linear graph. How can I find a slope that I can use to find the specific heat capacity? Also, is there something wrong with my data? Should the relationship be linear?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Even though I don't know how you did what you did, I will try to help you. What kind of time is t in your expression? The time required for what to happen?
 
t was my independent variable. I monitored how the temperature of the water increased over time t. Does that make sense?
 
So t = 0 is when you started heating and t is some later time when the temperature of the water reached value T. Is that so?
 
T is the dependent. I think I have about a hundred values for each. T keeps increasing until it reaches the boiling of water.
 
clarissalehne said:
T is the dependent. I think I have about a hundred values for each. T keeps increasing until it reaches the boiling of water.
Please answer my questions

1. Is t the overall time from when the experiment started to when the water reached some intermediate temperature between the initial and the boiling point?

2. Is T the temperature at time t as defined above?

A simple "yes" or "no" to each of the two questions above is sufficient at this point. As I said, I am trying to understand what you did and what your symbols mean.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top