Lagrange equation particle on an inverted cone

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive the equations of motion and show that the equation of motion for \phi implies that r^2\dot{\phi}=K where K is a constant

Homework Equations


Using cylindrical coordinates and z=\alpha r
The kinetic and potential energies are
T=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right] and
V=mg\alpha r
The Lagrangian is
L\left(r,\dot{r},\dot{\phi}\right)=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right]-mg\alpha r
The equation of motion is
\dfrac{d}{d t}\left(\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{\mathbf{q}_{k}}}\right)-\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\mathbf{q}_{k}}=0

The Attempt at a Solution


The equation of motion for r
\ddot{r}+\alpha^{2}\ddot{r}-r\dot{\phi}^{2}+g\alpha =0
The equation of motion for \phi
r^{2}\dot{\phi}-r^{2}\ddot{\phi} =0
Is this correct? If so how does it imply that r^2\dot{\phi}=K is a constant?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobred said:

Homework Statement


Derive the equations of motion and show that the equation of motion for \phi implies that r^2\dot{\phi}=K where K is a constant

Homework Equations


Using cylindrical coordinates and z=\alpha r
The kinetic and potential energies are
T=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right] and
V=mg\alpha r
The Lagrangian is
L\left(r,\dot{r},\dot{\phi}\right)=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right]-mg\alpha r
The equation of motion is
\dfrac{d}{d t}\left(\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{\mathbf{q}_{k}}}\right)-\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\mathbf{q}_{k}}=0

The Attempt at a Solution


The equation of motion for r
\ddot{r}+\alpha^{2}\ddot{r}-r\dot{\phi}^{2}+g\alpha =0
The equation of motion for \phi
r^{2}\dot{\phi}-r^{2}\ddot{\phi} =0
Is this correct? If so how does it imply that r^2\dot{\phi}=K is a constant?
Thanks

Your ##\phi##-equation is incorrect:
$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = m r^2 \dot{\phi},$$
so
$$\frac{d}{dt} (m r^2 \dot{\phi}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} = 0 .$$
 
  • Like
Likes bobred
Hi, got it thanks. Integrating the left hand side gives
r^2\dot{\phi}=K
Meaning I can eliminate \dot{\phi} from the equation of motion for r
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top