Lagrange equations of a spinning parabola

tehdiddulator
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a bead of mass m sliding without friction on a wire that is bent in the shape of a parabola and is being spun with constant angular velocity ω about its vertical axis. Use cylindrical polar coordinates and let the equation of the parabola be ##z = kρ^{2}##. Write down the lagrangian in terms of ρ as the generalized coordinate. Find the equation of motion.

Homework Equations



$$L = T-U = \frac{1}{2}mv^2-mgy$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I just need a hint on how to set up the kinetic energy of the parabola, maybe someone can explain it in a different way that would push me in the right direction.

Also, sorry if this isn't considered advanced physics. This is a classical mechanics class (upper level at my school) and it seems like a gray area for me.
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you need to change your coordinates to suit the problem better
 
tehdiddulator said:

Homework Statement



Consider a bead of mass m sliding without friction on a wire that is bent in the shape of a parabola and is being spun with constant angular velocity ω about its vertical axis. Use cylindrical polar coordinates and let the equation of the parabola be ##z = kρ^{2}##. Write down the lagrangian in terms of ρ as the generalized coordinate. Find the equation of motion.

Homework Equations



$$L = T-U = \frac{1}{2}mv^2-mgy$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I just need a hint on how to set up the kinetic energy of the parabola, maybe someone can explain it in a different way that would push me in the right direction.
A straightforward method is to write down expressions for x(t), y(t), and z(t) and then differentiate them with respect to time. For example, ##x(t) = \rho\cos \phi##, so
$$\dot{x}(t) = \dot{\rho}\cos \phi - \rho\sin\phi \,\dot{\phi}.$$ When you have all three, plug them into ##v^2 = \dot{x}(t)^2 + \dot{y}(t)^2 + \dot{z}(t)^2##.

By the way, I think the potential term in the Lagrangian should be mgz, not mgy.

Also, sorry if this isn't considered advanced physics. This is a classical mechanics class (upper level at my school) and it seems like a gray area for me.
Thanks!
It's in the right place.
 
Ah, I suppose I should add in the major fact that they want it in terms of the generalized coordinate rho. I can try and find/make a picture of the graph if it helps.

and yes, you are correct, the potential would be mgz.
 
The expression you end up with will be in terms of ##\rho##.
 
Everything worked out properly! Thanks a bunch for your help.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top