Lagrange multipliers rotating masses connected by spring

kanne
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass, m1, is constrained to move in a circle with radius a at z=0 and another particle of mass, m2, moves in a circle of radius b at z=c. For this we wish to write up the Lagrangian introucing the constraints by lagrange multipliers and solve the following equations of motion.

Homework Equations



Equations of constraint.

z1=0\ \ x1^2+y1^2=a^2
z2=c \ \ x2^2+y2^2=b^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I am working on the Lagrangian given by

L=T-V+\lambda_1\left(-z_1\right)+\lambda_2\left(c-z_2\right)+\lambda_3\left(a^2-x_1^2-y_1^2\right)+\lambda_4\left(b^2-x_2^2-y_2^2\right)

with
T=\frac{1}{2}m_1\left(\dot{x}_1^2+\dot{y}_1^2+\dot{z}_2^2\right)+\frac{1}{2}m_2\left(\dot{x}_2^2+\dot{y}_2^2+\dot{z}_2^2\right)
and
V=\frac{1}{2}k\left(\left(x_2-x_1\right)^2+\left(y_2-y_1\right)^2+\left(z_2-z_1\right)^2\right)

From this we get the equations of motion:

m_1\ddot{x_1}=-k\left(x_2-x_1\right)-2\lambda_3x_1

m_1\ddot{y_1}=-k\left(y_2-y_1\right)-2\lambda_3y_1

m_1\ddot{z_1}=-k\left(z_2-z_1\right)-\lambda_1

m_2\ddot{x_2}=k\left(x_2-x_1\right)-2\lambda_4x_2

m_2\ddot{y_2}=k\left(y_2-y_1\right)-2\lambda_4y_2

m_2\ddot{z_2}=k\left(z_2-z_1\right)-\lambda_2 [\tex]<br /> <br /> <br /> Anyone know how to solve these equations of motion
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could reduce the number of coordinates by introducing polar coordinates for each mass. There would be less equations to solve.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top