Lagrangian (chain off spring connected masses)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ballzac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Spring
ballzac
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


______|equillibrium position________
______|__i_____________________
m^^^^^m^^^^^m^^^^^m^^^^^m
____k_|qi|____k______ k________kA collection of particles each of mass m separated by springs with spring constant k. The displacement of the ith mass from its equilibrium position is q_i=q_i(t). Write the Langrangian for this one dimensional chain of masses.

Homework Equations


K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2
V=\frac{1}{2}kx^2
L=K-V

The Attempt at a Solution


So we have K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2=\frac{1}{2}m(\frac{dx}{dt})^2
Can I now say
K=\frac{1}{2}m\frac{dq_i}{dt}^2
?
(I think I have to because I then have to differentiate wrt q_i
Also, the extension of the springs to begin with must matter because if they are taught then the potential energy must be higher. Am I right? Does it matter that there is a spring on either side? I guess it does, but as the mass is just moving between its equilibrium point maybe they kind of cancel out. There are N particles, so am I right in thinking that the energy required is the sum of all functions of q_i for every i\leq N?

I haven't been given very long for this, and I've never come across this stuff before, so I'm having issues figuring it out. Thanks for the help.

EDIT: Yeah, so I'm thinking V=\frac{1}{2}kq_i ^2 or V=kq_i ^2 but then I'm still not sure if the original taughtness of the spring comes into it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I would make a different coordinate for each mass. So mass 1-x1, mass 2-x2 and so on{at equilibrium position}. Get the potentials for each mass in terms of those different coordinates. Get kinetic energy for each mass, then do L=K-V. I think the typical convention though is L=T-U.
 
Okay, thank you I will try that. I'm just using the notation that was given in the handouts. Not sure if there is any significance.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top