Lagrangian of a mass bewteen two springs with a pendulum hanging down

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a system consisting of a mass ##m_2## between two springs and a pendulum of mass ##m_1##. The generalized coordinates are defined as ##x_2## for the mass's position and ##\theta## for the pendulum's angle. The kinetic energy is expressed as ##T=\frac{1}{2}m_2\dot x_2^2+\frac{1}{2}m_1(\dot x_2^2+l^2\dot\theta^2+2\dot x_2\dot\theta l)##, while the potential energy for the springs is derived based on their displacements. The potential energy equations are clarified, particularly the relationship between the displacements of the springs and the mass's position, leading to the conclusion that the potential energy must account for the equilibrium position of the mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Basic calculus for derivatives and motion equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics in detail, focusing on generalized coordinates
  • Learn about the derivation of equations of motion for systems with multiple degrees of freedom
  • Explore the implications of potential energy in spring systems using Hooke's Law
  • Investigate the effects of equilibrium positions on dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, engineers working with dynamic systems, and anyone interested in the applications of Lagrangian mechanics in real-world scenarios.

Davidllerenav
Messages
424
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
A particle of mass ##m_1## hangs from a rod of negligible mass and length ##l##, whose support point consists of another particle of mass ##m_2## that moves horizontally subject to two springs of constant ##k## each one. Find the equations of motion for this system.
Relevant Equations
##L=T-V##
1613067282872.png

What I first did was setting the reference system on the left corner. Then, I said that the position of the mass ##m_2## is ##x_2##. I also supposed that the pendulum makes an angle ##\theta## with respect to the vertical axis ##y##. So the generalized coordinates of the system would be ##x_2## and ##\theta##. Thus, the coordinates of ##m_1## are:
  • ##x_1=x_2+l\sin\theta##
  • ##y_1=-l\cos\theta##
Then I took the time derivative of both ##x_1## and ##y_1##:
  • ##\dot x_1=\dot x_2+l\dot\theta\cos\theta##
  • ##\dot y_1=l\dot\theta\sin\theta##
The Kinetic energy ##T## would be the sum of the kinetic energy of each mass ##T=T_1+T_2##. Since ##T1=\frac{1}{2}m_2\dotx_2^2## and ##T_2=\frac{1}{2}m_1(\dot x_1^2+\dot y_1^2##, I got:
  • ##T=\frac{1}{2}m_2\dot x_2^2+\frac{1}{2}m_1(\dot x_2^2+l^2\dot\theta^2+2\dot x_2\dot\theta l)##
Now, I have trouble with the potential energy. The potential energy of ##m_1## is easy, it would be just ##V_1=m_1gh##:
  • ##V_1=-m_1gl\cos\theta##
The potential energy of ##m_2## would be the sum of the potential energy that each spring has on the mass. What I did was saying that that the mass ##m_2## moves a distance ##x_2##, thus the lhs spring would have a displacement of ##x_2## and the rhs spring would have a contraction of ##x_2## likewise. So:
  • ##V_2=\frac{1}{2}k x_2^2+\frac{1}{2}k(-x_2)^2=kx_1^2##
But, according to my teacher, if the first spring moves a distance ##x_2##, then the second would contract a distance of ##a-x_2##, where ##a## is the distance between the walls, that is constant. I don't understand why this is the case, can you please explain it better for me to understand? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say
x_2=\frac{a}{2} , natual length of spring,
V_2=0
So
V_2=k(x_2-\frac{a}{2})^2
 
I don't understand it either. If ##s_1## and ##s_2## are the lengths of both springs then ##a = s_1 + s_2##.

Now, if one spring stretches by ##x## then the other spring must be compressed by the same amount, ## (s_1 + x) + (s_2 - x) = a##

And if ##V_1 = \frac12 k x^2## then ##V_2 = \frac12 k x^2## and so ##V = V_1 + V_2 = k x^2##

Although, I have the origin where ##m_2## is at rest. You say your origin is in the left corner. So the left spring is attached to the origin. Your teacher attaches the the right spring to ##a##.

Now if you move ##m_2## the new location will be at ##x_2## as measured from the origin for the left spring, and at ##a - x_2## which is measured from the right wall for the right spring.
 
Last edited:
Davidllerenav said:
What I first did was setting the reference system on the left corner.

x=0 at the left corner. Do you count V2=0 for x2=0,i.e. the mass is on the left corner ?
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
x=0 at the left corner. Do you count V2=0 for x2=0,i.e. the mass is on the left corner ?
No. I count ##V_2=0## when ##x_2=a/2##, i.e. when the mass is halfway between the two walls.
 
Marc Rindermann said:
I don't understand it either. If ##s_1## and ##s_2## are the lengths of both springs then ##a = s_1 + s_2##.

Now, if one spring stretches by ##x## then the other spring must be compressed by the same amount, ## (s_1 + x) + (s_2 - x) = a##

And if ##V_1 = \frac12 k x^2## then ##V_2 = \frac12 k x^2## and so ##V = V_1 + V_2 = k x^2##

Although, I have the origin where ##m_2## is at rest. You say your origin is in the left corner. So the left spring is attached to the origin. Your teacher attaches the the right spring to ##a##.

Now if you move ##m_2## the new location will be at ##x_2## as measured from the origin for the left spring, and at ##a - x_2## which is measured from the right wall for the right spring.
So, the result I got would only be correct if the origin is halfway between the two walls?
 
Yes. And for your original coordinate see #2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Davidllerenav
anuttarasammyak said:
Say
x_2=\frac{a}{2} , natual length of spring,
V_2=0
So
V_2=k(x_2-\frac{a}{2})^2
I'm I bit confused by the use of ##x_2##, so let's say that ##x_2## is the position of the mass at its equilibrium position, i.e. ##x_2=a/2## as you said. And let ##x## be the position of the mass at some time Then if the mass moves to the right to a point ##x##, the left spring would stretch a distance of ##x-x_2=x-a/2##. But, wouldn't the spring on the right be compressed by the same amount?
 
That's the reason why ##k## ,not ##\frac{k}{2}## for a single spring, in ##V_2##. Doubled as you did yourself in #1 and #3.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Davidllerenav
  • #10
Davidllerenav said:
Homework Statement:: A particle of mass ##m_1## hangs from a rod of negligible mass and length ##l##, whose support point consists of another particle of mass ##m_2## that moves horizontally subject to two springs of constant ##k## each one. Find the equations of motion for this system.
Relevant Equations:: ##L=T-V##

But, according to my teacher, if the first spring moves a distance ##x_2## , then the second would contract a distance of ##a-x_2##, where is the distance between the walls, that is constant. I don't understand why this is the case, can you please explain it better for me to understand?
Your generalized coordinates are relative to an origin that is at ##m_2## when the system is at equilibrium, string vertical, springs relaxed. This choice allows you to use the same symbol ##x_2## to denote both the generalized coordinate and the amount by which each spring is compressed or stretched. Thus, if ##m_2## is displaced to the right, the elastic potential energy is as you have written it ##V_{\text{el}}=\frac{1}{2}kx_2^2+\frac{1}{2}kx_2^2=kx_2^2.##

Now suppose you choose to measure generalized coordinate ##x_2## relative to the left wall. If ##m_2## is again displaced from equilibrium to the right, the amount by which the left spring is stretched is ##x_2-\frac{a}{2}## and the amount by which the right spring is compressed is ##\frac{a}{2}-x_2## and the potential energy is ##V_{\text{el}}=\frac{1}{2}k(x_2-\frac{a}{2})^2+\frac{1}{2}k(\frac{a}{2}-x_2)^2=k(x_2-\frac{a}{2})^2.##

In such problems involving springs and Lagrangians one needs to be careful to enunciate the differences, if any, between generalized coordinates and spring displacements.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Davidllerenav

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K