Lagrangian: singularity in inverted pendulum EoMs?

Eigenentity
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm doing some analysis of a bicycle mechanics problem and at one point the approximations I'm making mean that the problem reduces to the classic inverted pendulum. I'm very confused, as the equations I've worked out appear to have an unphysical singularity in them, and I can't see where it's coming from.

So, the problem is this: equations of motion of a point mass m on the end of a light rigid rod (length l), the other end of which is attached to a light, frictionless carriage, constrained to move only in the horizontal direction.

So, the problem has two degrees of freedom: x and \theta.

By my reckoning, the position vector of the pendulum bob, counting angle clockwise from the upwards vertical, is:

\mathbf{r}=(x + l \sin\theta, l \cos\theta)

This gives a Lagrangian of:

L = \frac{m \dot{\mathbf{r}}^2}{2} - m g \cos{\theta} = \frac{m \dot{x}^2}{2} + \frac{m l^2 \dot{\theta}^2}{2} + m \dot{x} \dot{\theta} l \cos{\theta} - m g \cos{\theta}

Now, the Euler-Lagrange equations end up as

\ddot{x} + \ddot{\theta} l \cos{\theta} - \dot{\theta}^2 l \sin{\theta} = 0
\ddot{\theta} + \ddot{x} \cos\theta / l - g \sin\theta/l=0

which in turn reduce to:

\ddot{x} = \frac{\dot{\theta}^2 l - g \cos \theta }{\sin\theta}
\ddot{\theta} = \frac{g / l - \dot{\theta}^2 \cos\theta}{\sin\theta}

Do you spot the problem yet? There's a nasty singularity when \theta \to 0.

Can anyone tell me what's going wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To anyone wondering, the "unphysical" singularity arises from the unphysical assumption of a light carriage. With a carriage of nonzero mass M the EoMs become:

<br /> \ddot{x} = \frac{2 m \sin \theta \left(g \cos \theta - l \dot{\theta}^2\right)}{2 M + m (1 - \cos 2 \theta)}<br />
<br /> \ddot{\theta} = \frac{m l \dot{\theta}^2 \cos \theta-g (m+M)}{- m l \sin \theta - M l / \sin\theta}<br />

With no singularity as long as M \neq 0!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top