I Exploring the Lamb Shift: G-Factor & Angular Momentum

Riverplatense
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good day dear forum, greetings from Argentina. I am studying the Lamb Shift, which says that in the atomic orbitals, an upward energy shift occurs due to an interaction of the electron with itself. This means that a level s can have an energy slightly greater than a level p. So far so good, but there is something I do not understand and it is the following. This discovery also allowed us to estimate that the known factor g had a value slightly greater than 2 and not exactly 2 as previously thought. In the words of the book Rohlf Modern Physics from alpha to Z p.248: "There is a slight difference between the levels 2S (with j = 1/2) and 2P (with j = 1/2) since in the first case the j comes from the intrinsic angular momentum while in the second, the value of j comes from the unit of the orbital angular moment minus a half of the intrinsic angular momentum.If g is exactly equal to 2, then the z component of the angular momentum of the electron due to the intrinsic angular momentum is exactly equal to the z component of the magnetic moment due to a unit of orbital angular momentum. For g = 2, the energies of the n-fixed states depend only on the total angular momentum j and not on the sum of l and s that produce j, so since g is slightly greater than 2, the state P with j = 1/2 is less in energy than S with j = 1/2 ". I do not understand what g = 2 has to do with the z components of the moments being equal and why if g is greater than 2, the state P is smaller than that of S. I think I do not understand anything about that paragraph, any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Riverplatense said:
the Lamb Shift, which says that in the atomic orbitals, an upward energy shift occurs due to an interaction of the electron with itself.

Actually, it's due to the effects of vacuum fluctuations in the quantum electromagnetic field. There is no "interaction of the electron with itself" in QED; the only interaction term in the QED Lagrangian is between electrons and photons.
 
  • Like
Likes DarMM and bhobba
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top