Lambert W Function: Calculate W(5.67)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mabauti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
mabauti
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Lambert W *edit*

How are these numbers calculated let's say W(5.67)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, mabauti! :smile:

You can calculate W(5.67) for instance with WolframAlpha:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=W(5.67)W can only be calculated by a numerical algorithm.
The Wolfram article about the Lambert W function gives a couple of series expansions that you can use:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.htmlYou could also approximate it with for instance the Newton-Raphson method with ##f(x)=xe^x - 5.67=0##.
That is: ##x_{k+1}=x_k - {f(x_k) \over f'(x_k)}##.
Start with ##x_0=2## and you should be able to find your result to an arbitrary precision within a couple of iterations.
 
great.

thanks ILS =D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
794
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top