Lambert W Function: Calculate W(5.67)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mabauti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The Lambert W function, specifically W(5.67), can be calculated using numerical algorithms, with WolframAlpha being a recommended tool for this purpose. Series expansions for the Lambert W function are available in Wolfram's resources, providing additional methods for calculation. The Newton-Raphson method is another approach, defined by the equation f(x) = xe^x - 5.67 = 0, starting with an initial guess of x0 = 2. This iterative method can yield results to a high degree of precision after a few iterations. Accurate computation of W(5.67) is achievable through these techniques.
mabauti
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Lambert W *edit*

How are these numbers calculated let's say W(5.67)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, mabauti! :smile:

You can calculate W(5.67) for instance with WolframAlpha:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=W(5.67)W can only be calculated by a numerical algorithm.
The Wolfram article about the Lambert W function gives a couple of series expansions that you can use:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.htmlYou could also approximate it with for instance the Newton-Raphson method with ##f(x)=xe^x - 5.67=0##.
That is: ##x_{k+1}=x_k - {f(x_k) \over f'(x_k)}##.
Start with ##x_0=2## and you should be able to find your result to an arbitrary precision within a couple of iterations.
 
great.

thanks ILS =D
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
839
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top